← Anjishnu MukherjeePublications

Research overview

Multilingual NLP, Cultural Adaptation, and Social Bias in AI

By Anjishnu Mukherjee · Ph.D. candidate, George Mason University

My research examines how language and culture shape the behavior of AI systems. I study multilingual language models, develop ways to adapt text and images to local contexts, and evaluate and mitigate social biases. These directions connect a shared question: how can AI serve people whose languages and cultures are poorly represented in its training data?

Understanding multilingual and multicultural AI

A model’s ability to produce text in a language does not tell us how reliably it behaves in that language, or what it understands about the people who use it. My work examines this gap at both the behavioral and representational levels.

Double Trouble uses controlled bilingual pretraining to examine how learning another language changes English representations. Tower of Babel studies the mismatch between claimed language support and actual model behavior. Global Voices extends bias evaluation across languages with culturally grounded data. Together, these studies examine assumptions that can be missed when English performance is treated as a proxy for multilingual competence.

Related publications

Adapting text and image generation to local contexts

The same question can have different correct answers in different places, and the same visual concept can take different cultural forms. I study how models can use this context when generating answers and images.

MAPLE tests whether geographic metadata during pretraining helps models select locale-appropriate answers, using LocalNewsQA to measure whether answers change with the locale. Crossroads examines cultural artifacts in images and uses them for cultural adaptation. Global Gallery studies how instruction tuning and bilingual pretraining affect cultural knowledge. Across these settings, the aim is to evaluate local appropriateness explicitly, rather than assume it follows from general model capability.

Related publications

Evaluating and mitigating social bias in AI

Bias evaluations need to account for the social contexts in which models are used. I study associations that familiar stereotype-based tests can overlook, including culturally specific and intersectional biases in multilingual and multimodal settings.

BiasDora probes hidden associations in vision-language models, while our South Asian bias study examines open-ended generation across ten languages. Breaking Bias applies ideas from intergroup contact to instruction tuning. KnowBias explores a different intervention: strengthening neurons that encode knowledge about bias. This work connects broader evaluation with methods for reducing bias while retaining useful model capabilities.

Related publications